well, i have a new development laptop, one that i'm actually happy
will last several years and be up to the challenge of being absolutely
hammered without even coming close to going beyond its design spec.
it's an 8 core 3.2ghz i7 which can be overclocked to 4ghz. RAM maxes
out at 32 GB of 2400mhz DDR4 RAM. it can take *two* PCIe NVMe SSDs,
which i've confirmed can run at 485 MEGABYTES per second write speed
and a whopping 2100 MB / sec read speed. who designs this stuff??
it's so bonkers i'm having a hard time getting my head round the
specs... which continue with a hybrid graphics setup: the Intel
skylake HD 5500 normally controls the LCD, but there's a headless
co-processor (using "optimus" or "primus" - apt-get install
bumblebeed) in the form of a GTX 1060 with SIX gigabytes of DDR5 RAM.
3200 x 1800 14in LCD just tops off the list of insane specs.
oh, and as long as you use the 4.7.8 linux kernel under debian, *all*
the hardware works. there's a few niggles but i can sort those out as
things progress and become more confident with it.
full report's at http://lkcl.net/reports/aorus_x3_plus_v6.html
and yes, i used angband.pl "nosystemd" packages. i considered it to
be better to be using debian with all dependence on systemd and
libsystemd removed than it would be to try to convert to devuan, where
they've clearly established themselves as a "Reaction Against" systemd
yet their charter says "we are inclusive of all init services". i
can't endorse or live with that kind of lack of integrity, despite
loving everything else that they're doing and achieving (warts and
all: thank you phil for sending privately that evaluation report you
did of their work).
the only real niggle about using this machine: god is it way too
recent hardware. 4.8.* kernels don't work fully, 3.16 kernels don't
work fully, i had to go with the 4.7.8 kernel and compile it up myself
from source. i also haven't had to actually use debian/sid in a long,
*long* time. have to keep an eye on that....
l.
Hi,
Yesterday I bought a "Hercules eCAFE Slim HD", which is a small netbook
with:
- An IMX51 SOC and 512M of RAM (probably the maximum supported by that
SOC)
- A 1024x600 glossy display (sic[1][2]).
- a 8G eMMC with the system
- 2xSD slots
- A switch that is under a trap that switches the SOC boot modes.
Flipping that switch permits to boot from an external SD card (for
recovery or for booting the system)
It could be used as a computer that is impossible to persistently
compromise assuming that the switch is always set to boot on an
external SD card or that the internal eMMC is destroyed or removed.
It was also interesting for me as I'm familiar with the I.MX SOCs, and
that I was looking for a device to port parabola to. This would have
been a fast port.
Unfortunately the device bought was already opened, and the keyboard
connector was dammaged. I failed to notice that.
So I prepared a dts for it and compiled a kenrel to test, but the
keyboard wasn't working properly since the last time I opened it, so I
decided to fix that first.
Unfortunately I broke it while messing with the broken keyboard
connector. Probably a short circuit. The SOC doesn't enumerate anymore
on USB and the device doesn't react when I press the power button.
The DTS is pretty minimal and was intended to get a shell on it trough
g_serial.
It was produced by looking at the differences with the "imx51-babbage"
board on the vendor provided kernel, and re-applying the lack of
differences in a DTS.
So I publish it in case someone wants to test or to continue the port.
As I have a hard time finding such devices in France, the port will
probably be abandoned.
References:
-----------
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossy_display#Disadvantages
[2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossy_display#Adverse_health_effects
Denis.
Since as I understand it, the people at t-firefly have been pretty helpful
towards getting the RK3288 EOMA board put together, I figured I would point
out that they have just launched a crowdfunding campaign to build a RK3399
development board.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1771382379/firefly-rk3399-six-core-64-…
I'm not sure if that rk3399 processor would be able to work for a future
EOMA68 design however, if it did, it would bring some cool advantages. It
looks like it supports USB 3.0, it is a 64-bit processor, and like the
RK3288, it can support 4 GB of memory.
>https://developer.nvidia.com/embedded/downloads#?tx=$product,jetson_tx1$har…
>
>ooooooooo! includes hardware design fiiiles. at laaast, nvidia is Getting It.
>
Nice, need to make an account with them first, then it works fine.
Looks like the SoM is too much power to be an EOMA68 card though. Is it possible
to get it down to 5 watts?
>and it looks like according to this
>https://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/FeatureMatrix/ that the X1, which
>is a NV110 (maxwell family) should be supported by noveau. NV12B
>(GM20B) Tegra X1
>
>ooooo, that's reaally excitiiing...
>
>l.
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 19:07:32 +0000
> From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl(a)lkcl.net>
> To: Linux on small ARM machines <arm-netbook(a)lists.phcomp.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [Arm-netbook] new development laptop needed, looking at
> dell xps 13 9350
> Message-ID:
> <CAPweEDx3abbKtx46=hO24BJPepaSqg8_K+mz7pUMBTY3sVR6sw@mail.
> gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On 12/4/16, Andrew Mike <andrew(a)logomancy.net> wrote:
> > You could get a Gigabyte Aero 14:
> > http://www.xoticpc.com/gigabyte-aero-14.html
> >
> > 2560x1440 14-inch screen, 1.9 kg, but has everything else you wanted at
> > your price point.
>
> dang. up to 32gb DDR4 RAM. in a laptop. i'm very very tempted...
> the only thing is: although the current screen i'm using is 2560x1600,
> i just know damn well i'll miss the ... *goes to run python as a
> calculator*... 160 pixels. it makes the difference between being able
> to run 2 80x56 xterms one above the other.
>
> > There's also the AORUS X3 Plus PC3K4D:
> > http://www.xoticpc.com/aorus-x3-plus-v6-pc3k4d.html
> >
> > Still misses the weight budget, and is $2000, but it has a smaller
> > higher-res screen and meets all your other expectations.
>
> *splutter* http://www.aorus.com/Product/Spec/X3%20Plus%20v6
> overclocking to 4ghz, up to 32gb DDR4 2400mhz RAM, *dual* PCIe SSDs,
> supports nvidia graphics cards up to *6* GB, 150 watt power supply,
> does it _really_ take dual batteries? wtf this is a _monster_!!
>
> ... i love it.
>
> the fiscally-responsible thing to do would be to get a dell xps 13
> 9350. given that it's a path that's been trail-blazed already and
> there are software libre developers out there who've bought it, gone
> to the trouble of poking dell's support team with a stick, found out
> how to disable the (Reference-Design-by-default) RAID setting on the
> NVMe drives in the BIOS, and so on, it would be a lot less hassle.
>
> *however*.... thinking it through... the only reason i said "16GB
> RAM" is because i didn't expect there to be *laptops* out there which
> could take up to 32GB RAM. i made the mistake of getting not enough
> memory once already.
>
> tell you what i'll do: i'm going to register on their forums and make
> some enquiries.
>
>
> > Sadly, you'll have to pay the Windows tax on either. :/
>
> *grumbles*...
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook(a)lists.phcomp.co.uk
> > http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
> > Send large attachments to arm-netbook(a)files.phcomp.co.uk
>
>
Actually, you don't have to pay the windows Tax on an XPS 13 or XPS 15.
http://www.dell.com/us/business/p/xps-13-9360-laptop/pd?3x_nav=OS_BRAND%3DU…
Try searching for Dell XPS developer edition, those are sold running Ubuntu
instead of Windows. Here is a version of the XPS 13 with 16 GB of memory:
http://www.dell.com/us/business/p/xps-13-9360-laptop/pd?oc=cax13ubuntuh5133…
http://hands.com/~lkcl/eoma/rockchip_rk3288/http://rhombus-tech.net/rock_chips/rk3288/firefly/
for anyone who's interested, i've published the PDFs of both the
8-layer PCB and the schematics. i'm also documenting resources for
installing mainline u-boot and linux kernel on the RK3288 firefly
(t-firefly kindly sent me a developer board). apparently there are
people who have installed debian stable on the firefly (for headless
use) out-of-the-box, which is a really good sign.
the RK3288 because it's a slightly older SoC which was used in the
Asus C201 chromebook, it seems to have extremely prolific "HOWTOs" out
there, as well as stable support in the official chromium kernel
releases and a stack-load more.
the only thing which is a complete utter pain: the 2nd USB controller
(not the one that provides both 1 USB and 1 OTG port) has at least two
known hardware bugs. first is: it doesn't support USB 1.1 devices
(argh...) and second it doesn't come back up on resume.
fortunately the *other* USB controller - the one that has 1 USB2 Host
and 1 OTG port - works perfectly. on the firefly rk3288, i tried the
OTG Host converter cables i have, plugged in a USB keyboard, up it
came first time.
i think the RK3288 would be an awesome choice for EOMA68, not least
because it can do 4GB RAM.
l.
2
2
CE markings
by pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
01 Dec '16
01 Dec '16
A colleague of a friend of mine had problems getting some electronics
without CE marking through customs. Let me ask just to be on the safe
side: I presume the EOMA68-A20 and casings will have CE markings as
appropriate?
Regards,
Florian